@misc{Gheondea-Eladi_Alexandra_What,
 author={Gheondea-Eladi, Alexandra},
 howpublished={online},
 publisher={Zielona Góra: Lubuskie Towarzystwo Naukowe},
 publisher={Zielona Góra: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Wydział Pedagogiki, Psychologii i Socjologii},
 language={eng},
 abstract={This paper discusses the mechanisms that lead to consensus in shared decision-making (SDM) from a theoretical point of view. It considers the way in which SDM interventions are expected to share information, preferences and create shared mental representations in treatment decisions. It draws on consensus theory to argue that both content-based and process-based consensus are needed in SDM interventions in order to achieve an acceptable level of shared-ness.},
 abstract={Three types of conditions are identified from the literature for fostering consensus: content, agent and process conditions. These conditions are further pursued in one Practitioner Training support document and one SDM intervention evaluation report. The analysis revealed that the SDM interventions analyzed pursue only process-based consensus, while disregarding content-based consensus. Further research is required for generalized conclusions. Further implications for practice of these findings are expected to be in the area of patient adherence to treatment and patient satisfaction with service quality.},
 title={What connects us in shared decision-making in health = Co nas łączy w podejmowaniu wspólnych decyzji o zdrowiu},
 type={artykuł},
 keywords={shared decision-making, consensus, training health professionals, wspólne decyzje, konsensus, kształcenie pracowników},
}