@misc{Flis_Jarosław_Powszechność,
 author={Flis, Jarosław and Stolicki, Dariusz},
 howpublished={online},
 publisher={Zielona Góra: Lubuskie Towarzystwo Naukowe},
 publisher={Zielona Góra: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Wydział Pedagogiki, Psychologii i Socjologii},
 language={pol},
 abstract={The aim of the article is to analyse the territorial polarization of rivalry in the elections for Polish regional assemblies (sejmiks) between 2006 and 2014. The authors compared the support for electoral committees in the counties (powiats) showing higher and the counties showing lower than the average for a whole province (wojewodztwo) results. The study covered all Polish provinces. To perform the study, the authors used the indicator of territorial shifts.},
 abstract={It was noted that the support for big parties was less polarized, which leads to conclusions about the balance between integration and particularism as mechanisms generating electoral support. Referring to territorially polarized support helps parties to prove themselves in elections (passing statutory and natural thresholds), but achieving results that allow gaining power requires a bigger balance in the electoral base in a given territory.},
 type={artykuł},
 title={Powszechność i partykularyzm - przechyły terytorialne w wyborach sejmikowych 2006-2014 = Ubiquity and particularism - territorial shifts in the elections for polish regional assemblies between 2006 and 2014},
 keywords={wybory do sejmików, polaryzacja terytorialna, geografia wyborcza, wskaźnik przechylenia, elections for Polish regional assemblies, territorial polarization, electoral geography, indicator of shift},
}