@misc{Binder_Piotr_Od,
 author={Binder, Piotr},
 howpublished={online},
 publisher={Zielona Góra: Lubuskie Towarzystwo Naukowe},
 publisher={Zielona Góra: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Wydział Nauk Społecznych},
 language={pol},
 abstract={The analyses, inspired by boundary theory and the life course perspective, addressed the compatibility of remote work with the specificities of early adulthood. The empirical basis was a longitudinal qualitative study, i.e., 54 interviews with young adults conducted in 2020-2021. The interpretations suggest that working from home (especially hybrid work) was perceived not only as a friendly experience but also as worthwhile and desirable in the future.},
 abstract={Therefore, they differ from the pre-epidemic findings, highlighting the mismatch between remote work and this period of life. Remote work was associated with a gradual change in respondents` lifestyles, encouraging a focus on close relationships that partly compensated for losing social contacts. Those living with a partner could better manager the boundaries between work and non-work. However, over time, single people also became more open to remote work.},
 abstract={The study underscores the role of the longitudinal perspective in analysing long-term experiences, as it emphasizes the ambiguity of the consequences of the pandemic period in participants` narratives.},
 title={Od przymusu do wyboru. Młodzi dorośli a praca zdalna w czasie pandemii w podłużnych badaniach jakościowych = From coercion to choice. Young adults and remote work during the pandemic in qualitative longitudinal research},
 type={artykuł},
 keywords={remote work, young adults, boundary theory, life course, qualitative longitudinal research, praca zdalna, młodzi dorośli, teoria granic, bieg życia, podłużne badania jakościowe},
}