Szumigraj, Marcin - red. ; Trębińska-Szumigraj, Ewa - red. ; Zielińska-Pękał, Daria - red.
This article formulates a thesis that the meaning of "subjectivity" and "objectivity" is not obvious and it is difficult to preserve in empirical research their "ontological" understanding. The justification behind drawing attention to this - seemingly - obvious issue is still occurring (especially among people superficially familiar with quality methodology) conviction, that quantity research aspire to "objective cognition", unlike, quality research - aspires to the presentation of an individual, "subjective perspective" of human experiences. ; I argue by recalling an example of alike sounding statements by graduates of pedagogy, which were subject to a researcher interpretation and they turned out to have significantly different meanings (similar words, different structural sense). I also introduce here (in short) the method of objective hermeneutics, signalling the basic assumptions and technical solutions applied while interpreting data. Although, I refer to empirical material, I do not present research results (I do not discuss the chosen issue) however, I pay attention to the difficulties with the reconstruction of "subjective" meanings and senses.
Zielona Góra: Lubuskie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Rocznik Lubuski, tom 41, część 1
Biblioteka Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego
2024-07-10
2024-07-10
20
https://zbc.uz.zgora.pl/publication/89752
Zybertowicz, Andrzej
Kowalski, Mirosław Kowalski, Mirosław - red. Kowalska, Ewa - red.
Gorzelana, Joanna Kaczor, Monika - red. nauk. Seul, Anastazja - red. nauk.
Radtke, Irena Sauter, Wiesław (1905-1996) - red.
Tichoniuk-Wawrowicz, Ewa Steciąg, Magdalena - red. nauk. Kaczor, Monika - red. nauk.
Młyńczyk, Łukasz Młyńczyk, Łukasz red.
Czeremski, Maciej Sapeńko, Roman - red. Czeremski, Maciej - red.